

Dave's Side: That would be telling. And as with this episode, there is no telling. That might be due to my two distant viewings of it though - one weeks ago and the other while i was making my sandwich/burger. Still, i found this one somehow disjointed, not flowing from plot-point to plot-point in a way that makes for easy recall. Number 6 is set upon by members of the Village who don't think he's being mutual - all of this is done in a rather unmutual way, i thought. Number 6's issue is addressed through predictably unsuccessful means (including observation of aggressive therapy on others), so he is brought in for such therapy (a lobotomy). But it's a fake lobotomy and he is drugged. Then he acts kind of weird for a while, maybe testing himself for aggressive qualities. Then he sees he's being drugged and pulls a switch. Someone is hypnotized, the tables are turned, and the Village goes after Number 2, believing he has been unmutual. So... this means the majority of the Village is not "in on the con?" That was almost as confusing to me (in the grand scheme) as it was confusing to see Number 6 fail to use his perceived state of being lobotomized to better effect (like, leading "them" on and somehow getting them to see the truth of his retirement... or some truth that would get him out of there... or would that be as likely as him pretending to join "them?"... and does he know better than us - as we are not spies like them - that most of these pedestrian efforts would result in his death, and that his only way out is by fisticuffs and straight-up escape from the Village?). I don't know. And i guess that's why we're watching 40 years later.
